West Ham United’s potential move for Dominic Calvert-Lewin raises significant concerns for a number of reasons, especially when considering the club’s current position and attacking needs. The Hammers are undeniably in desperate need of reinforcements up front, but Calvert-Lewin, given his recent form and injury history, seems an ill-advised option.

The striker’s current season has been a far cry from the kind of form that made him a sought-after player just a few years ago. With only two goals to his name this season, it’s clear that Calvert-Lewin has struggled to recapture his best form. His lack of consistent output in the Premier League is troubling, especially for a club like West Ham, which has seen its own attacking options struggle for goals. While Calvert-Lewin was once regarded as a promising talent with potential, his current performances suggest a player who is well off the pace. His difficulties in front of goal are compounded by his persistent injury issues, which have become a major concern throughout his career. Calvert-Lewin has spent a significant portion of the past few seasons on the sidelines, with recurring fitness problems severely limiting his availability for Everton. This track record raises further questions about his reliability and whether West Ham can afford to take such a risk, especially with a player who has already proven to be injury-prone.

Additionally, the fact that Everton are reportedly open to parting ways with him speaks volumes about his current standing at the club. Everton’s willingness to let him go, especially in a time when they are also struggling for attacking options, suggests that his contributions have not met the expectations. For a striker once considered to be an integral part of the team, this shift in stance only underscores how far his stock has fallen in recent times. It’s hard to ignore the implications this could have on his potential future at West Ham, particularly if he continues to struggle with injuries and lack of form.

From a financial perspective, Calvert-Lewin’s reported £100,000-a-week wage is another major issue. West Ham are already dealing with their own financial constraints, and adding a player with such a hefty wage who has not been delivering in terms of goals or consistency is a risky proposition. While top-tier Premier League strikers often command high wages, the fact remains that West Ham would likely be paying a premium for a player who, at best, is unproven in recent months and, at worst, could be another injury-prone liability. In the long run, this could represent poor value for money, especially if Calvert-Lewin fails to live up to expectations or is frequently unavailable due to injuries.

When considering all these factors, it becomes clear that Dominic Calvert-Lewin may not be the ideal signing for West Ham at this point in time. Despite the urgent need for a forward who can score goals and offer a different dimension to their attack, Calvert-Lewin does not seem to be the right fit for a club that needs stability and consistency. With his form in decline and injury woes hanging over him, bringing him to the London Stadium could end up being another failed venture in Tim Steidten’s recruitment strategy.

The Hammers need to be looking for a more dependable option—someone who can provide goals immediately and stay fit over the course of a long season. There are other forwards on the market who offer better value, a more consistent track record, and a lower risk factor than Calvert-Lewin. West Ham cannot afford to waste valuable resources on a player whose future is uncertain, especially when the club’s top-flight survival and ambitions in Europe rely on getting key signings right. Therefore, it’s clear that if Steidten greenlights this move, it could mark another misstep in the club’s recruitment strategy, further fueling frustration among supporters. West Ham simply must look elsewhere for the attacking reinforcements they desperately need.